Tweeter Opco – CDDJ Bankruptcy Adversary Proceedings Report of Complaints, Dismissals, Defaults, Judgments

This APScans is a report of the complaints, dismissals, defaults and judgments (“CDDJ”) in the Tweeter Opco, LLC adversary proceedings for recovery of avoidable transfers under Chapter 5 of the Bankruptcy Code, including preferential transfers under Section 547 (bankruptcy preferences) brought by George L. Miller, in his capacity as Chapter 7 Trustee of the bankruptcy estates of Tweeter Opco, LLC, Tweeter Newco, LLC, Tweeter Tivoli, LLC and Tweeter Intellectual Property, LLC. This report is a “start-end” report and does not report filings between these CDDJ events.

This APScans covers filings ENTERED during the period from January 1, 2010 date through Thursday, November7, 2013. -

Dist/Cs/JdgDocket TextFiled By/ForAP Name/AP No/Dkt NoClaim TypeEntered
Processing Data from Server
© 2011-2013 Burbage & Weddell LLC All Rights Reserved. Use of APSCANS is subject to www.burbageweddell.com Terms of Use. APSCANS™ is a trademark of Burbage & Weddell LLC

Related Materials:

Adversary Proceedings Overview

Lead Bankruptcy Case Name (Case Number): Tweeter Opco, LLC (08-12646)

Petition Date: November 5, 2008 filed as a Chapter 11; December 5, 2008 the Court entered an Order converting these cases to Chapter 7

Filed in: United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware

Associated Cases: The Associated Debtors are: Tweeter Newco, LLC, Tweeter Tivoli, LLC and Tweeter Intellectual Property, LLC

Plaintiff: George L. Miller, in his capacity as Chapter 7 Trustee of the bankruptcy estates of Tweeter Opco, LLC, Tweeter Newco, LLC, Tweeter Tivoli, LLC and Tweeter Intellectual Property, LLC

Number of Proceedings: 196

When Filed: 56 filed on November 1, 2010; 84 on November 2, 2010; 49 on November 3, 2010; 6 on November 4, 2010; 1 on November 5, 2010

Adversary Proceeding Judge: Mary F. Walrath

Plaintiff's Counsel: Dilworth Paxson LLP through its attorneys Catherine G. Pappas (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) and Peter C. Hughes (Wilmington, Delaware)

Avoidance Period: The complaint identifies the preference period as "the 90-day period immediately preceding the Petition Date... ."

Although the complaints were filed during the first week of November, 2010, the first Summons was not issued until December 17, 2010.