This APScans is a report of the complaints, dismissals, defaults and judgments (“CDDJ”) in the Fortunoff Holdings, LLC aka Fortunoff Card Company adversary proceedings for recovery of avoidable transfers under Chapter 5 of the Bankruptcy Code, including preferential transfers under Section 547 (bankruptcy preferences) brought by Ian Gazes, Ian J. Gazes as Chapter 7 Trustee of the Estate of Fortunoff Holdings, LLC and Fortunoff Card Company. This report is a “start-end” report and does not report filings between these CDDJ events.
APScans Tags: The CADDJ Report uses complex algorithms in an attempt to identify filings in each of the categories of complaints, answers (and other responsive pleadings), defaults, dismissals and judgments. No assurance is given that the nature of each docket entry will be identified correctly.
Not For Individual Docket Monitoring: Pre-applied filters may eliminate important notices and certificates. A party to an adversary proceeding must not consider APScans to be a substitute for reviewing the docket of the proceeding in which it is a defendant.
This APScans covers filings ENTERED during the period from the petition date through Monday, February 23, 2015. -
Adversary Proceedings Overview
Lead Bankruptcy Case Name (Case Number): Fortunoff Holdings, LLC aka Fortunoff Card Company (09-10497)
Petition Date: Chapter 11 filed February 5, 2009; Converted to Chapter 7 on October 1, 2009
Bankruptcy Court District (Division): Southern District of New York (Manhattan)
Associated Debtors: The Associated Debtor in this case was Fortunoff Card Company, LLC.
Plaintiff:Ian Gazes, Ian J. Gazes as Chapter 7 Trustee of the Estate of Fortunoff Holdings, LLC and Fortunoff Card Company
Number of Proceedings: 312
When Filed:111 filed on February 3rd and 4th, 2011; July 21,2010 - 101 bankruptcy preference actions filed; September 23, 2010 - 100 bankruptcy preference actions filed
Adversary Proceeding Judge: U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Robert D. Drain
Plaintiff's Counsel:Gazes LLC by its attorney Ian J. Gazes
Avoidance Period: The complaint does not identify the preference period by dates.
Back to TopBack to Top