This APScans is a report of the complaints, answers (and other responsive pleadings), dismissals, defaults and judgments (“CADDJ”) in the Fluid Routing Solutions Intermediate Holding Corp adversary proceedings for recovery of avoidable transfers under Chapter 5 of the Bankruptcy Code, including preferential transfers under Section 547 (bankruptcy preferences) brought by Alfred T. Giuliano, Chapter 7 Trustee of Carolina Fluid Handling Intermediate Holding Corp. (f/k/a Fluid Routing Solutions Intermediate Holding Corp.). This report is a litigation status report and does not report filings between these CADDJ events.
APScans Tags: The CADDJ Report uses complex algorithms in an attempt to identify filings in each of the categories of complaints, answers (and other responsive pleadings), defaults, dismissals and judgments. No assurance is given that the nature of each docket entry will be identified correctly.
Not For Individual Docket Monitoring: Pre-applied filters may eliminate important notices and certificates. A party to an adversary proceeding must not consider APScans to be a substitute for reviewing the docket of the proceeding in which it is a defendant.
This APScans covers filings ENTERED during the period from January 1, 2010 date through Thursday, November7, 2013. -
Adversary Proceedings Overview
Lead Bankruptcy Case Name (Case Number): Fluid Routing Solutions Intermediate Holding Corp (09-10384)
Petition Date: Chapter 11 Petition filed February 6, 2009; Converted to Chapted 7 on September 28, 2009
Bankruptcy Court District (Division): District of Delaware
Associated Debtors: Fluid Routing Solutions, Inc.; Fluid Routing Solutions Automotive, LLC (f/k/a Mark IV Automotive LLC); and Detroit Fuel, Inc.
Plaintiff:Alfred T. Giuliano, Chapter 7 Trustee of Carolina Fluid Handling Intermediate Holding Corp. (f/k/a Fluid Routing Solutions Intermediate Holding Corp.)
Number of Proceedings: 98
When Filed:February 3, 2011
Adversary Proceeding Judge: U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Christopher S. Sontchi
Plaintiff's Counsel:Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP (Wilmington, Delaware) by its attorneys Laura Davis Jones; Andrew W. Caine; Bradford J. Sandler; Jeffrey Nolan; Peter J. Keane
Avoidance Period: The complaint identifies the preference period as the period "[w]ithin 90 days prior to the Commencement Date".
Back to TopBack to Top